![]() ![]() Lag delay? Yeah, that's very easy to account for. Once you send text, whether it's encrypted or not, all law enforcement really needs to do is line up timestamps, even if it's encrypted. Your proxy/VPN is connected to that IRC server, and you are connected to that proxy/vpn server at a specific time. How do you think people keep getting busted even though they're "behind 7 proxies"? If you're behind a proxy/vpn, you're still communicating with the IRC server. For me, anonymity is being anonymous to everyone, no matter what. Rory's definition is correct in the context of being anonymous to most people, but that's not the definition I subscribe to. Some people have a different definition of anonymity than me. Or maybe you'll just click on a drive-by-download link. Your IRC client could also be vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks / string formatting vulnerabilities / etc. What's to stop them from cooperating with law enforcement? While other servers will block everything, all IRCops/admins know the real IP you're connecting from. Even the ones that partially mask your IP will show part of where you are. The vast majority of servers I've visited also expose your IP Address to everyone unless you're behind a proxy or VPN, so there's no real anonymity. IRC admins can read your private messages as well. You have to install addons to enable encrypted communications, if they're even done right.Įven if the server itself encrypted the messages/uses SSL, it's a moot point: everyone can connect and read what you're saying unless you encrypted it on your end. All of your messages, in general, are unencrypted. Your ISP can snoop on the contents easily. Almost all servers utilize communication through plaintext. I don't think IRC is in any way secure by default. Internet Relay Chat is actually incredibly insecure Server: PRIVMSG #chat :Hello! Try typing. Server: : 315 alice #chat :End of WHO list Server: : 318 alice robodan :End of /WHOIS list Server: : 317 alice robodan 258 1614290467 :seconds idle, signon time Server: : 335 alice robodan :is a Bot on IRCv3 Server: : 318 robodan robodan :End of /WHOIS list Server: : 317 robodan robodan 24 1614290357 :seconds idle, signon time Server: : 335 robodan robodan :is a Bot on IRCv3 Server: : 379 robodan robodan :is using modes +bi Server: : 338 robodan robodan 203.0.113.22 :Actual Actual IP ![]() Server: : 005 robodan BOT=b CASEMAPPING=ascii CHANNELLEN=64 CHANTYPES=# ELIST=U EXCEPTS EXTBAN=,m :are supported by this server Server: : 001 robodan :Welcome to the IRCv3 IRC Network robodan The conventional BOT ISUPPORT value is "B", but this example uses "b" to demonstrate where the value’s used: Servers MUST NOT send this tag with a value, and clients MUST ignore any value if it exists. This tag MUST only be sent to users who have requested the message-tags capability. The tag SHOULD also be added by the ircd to all numerics directly caused by the bot. PRIVMSG, JOIN, MODE, NOTICE, and all others). This tag SHOULD be added by the server to all commands sent by a bot (e.g. The bot tag indicates that the given user is a bot. When a RPL_WHOREPLY (352) numeric is returned for a bot, the character used as the value of the ISUPPORT BOT token is returned in the flags (alongside H|G). Like other WHOIS reply numerics, is the nick of the sender, the nick of the client being whoised (the bot), and is arbitrary human-readable text. This numeric is returned as part of a bot’s WHOIS reply. When a client is marked as a bot, they are given a special numeric as part of their WHOIS response, it is indicated in their WHO flags, and servers may include the bot tag on that client’s outgoing messages. The value of the BOT token is the mode character which is used to enable bot mode and is also the flag used in WHO responses of bots (e.g. ![]() Servers publishing the BOT ISUPPORT token let clients mark themselves as bots by setting a user mode. This specification seeks to standardise the functionality, adding a message tag for increased visibility of bot status and an ISUPPORT token to allow for more flexible implementations. This functionality was previously implemented by several IRC servers in independent ways using fixed mode letters and conflicting WHOIS numerics. This specification defines a standardised mechanism to allow clients to mark themselves as bots. Unlimited redistribution and modification of this document is allowed provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice remains intact. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |